Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barr v. Allred et al
as 4:2015cv00542
Plaintiff:
Frank Barr, Sr.
Defendant:
P J Allred , Pima, Town of , Jason Ellsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allred v. Cobb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04017
Plaintiff:
Gloria Allred
Defendant:
Cobb County, Georgia, Cobb-Marietta Coliseum and Exhibit Hall Authority and Michael S. Taormina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. Weber County et al
as 1:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Lucero
Defendant:
Weber County, Ogden City and Christopher Allred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCubbin v. Weber County et al
as 1:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
Leland Kim McCubbin, Jr
Defendant:
Weber County, Ogden City and Christopher Allred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roufa v. Constantine et al
as 2:2015cv01379
Plaintiff:
Andrew Harris Roufa
Defendant:
Dow Constantine , Mohamed , County of King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allred v. Harper et al
as 7:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Allred
Defendant:
Jane V. Harper, Lisa V.L. Menefee, Harold T. Jarrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv01045
Plaintiff:
Damon Ellis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles A Daniels, David K. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Allred et al
as 2:2015cv06026
Plaintiff:
Christopher MacCorkle Smith and A.C.R. Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven A. Allred , Douglas E. Pauley and Brian Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathison v. USA et al
as 1:2014cv03345
Plaintiff:
Eugene H. Mathison
Defendant:
USA, Christopher Wilson, Ronald Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
