Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nilges v. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County et al
as 1:2016cv00884
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Arapahoe County Colorado Sheriff's Office, David C. Walcher and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Nelson Nilges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef - Fed. Question - Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Ruiz-Bueno, III, et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc, et al
as 15-3797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN C. RUIZ-BUENO, III, Administrator of the Estate of Edward Peterson and MICHAEL ANTHONY GAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., MARIA SYLVESTRI, MARY COMPTON and others
Defendant:
JANE DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ruiz-Bueno, III et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02548
Plaintiff:
John C Ruiz-Bueno, III and Michael Gay
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Maria Sylvestri, Mary Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
