Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Young et al v. Berkeley et al
as 3:2016cv00931
Plaintiff:
Carl Young , Roman Williams , Denys Williams and others
Defendant:
City of Berkeley, Michael K Meehan, Jesse Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hartman v. Brady et al
as 3:2015cv01753
Defendant:
Randy Bonds, Matthew P. Brady, City of Scappoose and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartman
Unknown:
Daryl L. Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morales v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06573
Plaintiff:
Alberto Morales
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Steven Stiller, NYPD Officer Gerald McDougall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00662
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McDougal v. Cash et al
as 1:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Ramiah McDougal
Defendant:
Adam Cash, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Tony Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
