Cases 41 - 50 of 80
KNIGHT v. ALLEN
as 4:2016cv00034
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALLEN
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN A. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wells v. Trustees
as 1:2015cv00205
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Wells
Defendant:
Trustees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Tertiary Trustee et al
as 1:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Wells
Defendant:
Tertiary Trustee and Primary Trustee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Allen et al
as 2:2014cv01126
Plaintiff:
Jarray White
Defendant:
Michael Allen , Jan Doe Allen, Todd Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cofield et al v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 1:2014cv02051
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield, Michael Allen and John Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, Maryland Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Orshowitz v. Dappen et al
as 2:2014cv14197
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Orshowitz
Defendant:
Donald Dappen, TROY W MORRIS, chadwick e wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COFIELD et al v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD, MICHAEL ALLEN and JOHN WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Theodore Justice v. Timothy Farley
as 14-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE JUSTICE, for Son
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. TIMOTHY FARLEY, Granville County School Superintendent, MARY WATSON, Director Exceptional Children, AUGUSTUS B. ELKINS, Administrative Law Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justice v. Farley et al
as 5:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Theodore Justice
Defendant:
Timothy Farley , Mary Watson , Augustus B. Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
