Cases 51 - 60 of 2,023
Trammell v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2024cv06116
Plaintiff:
Andrew Trammell
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Adam Johnson, Cortney Carbonel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Marchiafava v. Lewis et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Marchiafava Mark and Mark Marchiafava
Defendant:
Lewis Leonard, Paul Stout, Graham Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atherton et al v. Lake Charles et al
as 2:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Atherton and Heather Webb Atherton
Defendant:
City of Lake Charles, Lake Charles Police Department, Mikah Janelle Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schiff v. Brown
as 8:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Colon v. Noradin et al
as 1:2023cv16798
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Colon
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Petitioner:
Tyrone Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Noradin, et al
as 1:2023cv16799
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clay
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 23-2302
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant:
ANTHONY BROWN, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Maryland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
