Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,114
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5319
Plaintiff: CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant: CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, BRIAN MURPHY, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, STEVEN CARRICK, in their individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1278
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1517
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04360
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff: Tekeva Shaw
Defendant: Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meghan O Malley-Kail et al v. Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2024cv00654
Plaintiff: Maya Kail, Leah Kail, Meghan O'Malley-Kail and others
Defendant: Chad Bianco, Garrett Schultz, Michael Gundry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10606
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?