Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Depew v. Krisher et al
as 2:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rhett G. Depew
Defendant:
Gary Krisher, Lisa Bethel, Timothy Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Morris, et al v. Ronald Kesselring, et al
as 12-1069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE MORRIS and PAMELA MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT KESSELRING, ZUMBRUM, Officer, JAMES ROWE, II, Officer and others
Defendant:
ADAM FABRI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Morris, et al v. Robert Kesselring, et al
as 11-4360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE MORRIS and PAMELA MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT KESSELRING, ZUMBRUM, Officer, JAMES ROWE, II, Officer and others
Cofield v. Haleyville, Alabama, City of et al
as 6:2011cv04113
Plaintiff:
Tommy Cofield
Defendant:
Haleyville, Alabama, City of, Shane Whitten, Jonathan "Andy" Marbutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perez v. City of Harlingen
as 7:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
Maria Dahlia Perez
Defendant:
City of Harlingen, Carlos Yerena, Harlingen Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Fennimore v. Lower Twp, et al
as 11-2522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM FENNIMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWER TWP, DOUGLAS WHITTEN, MICHAEL IAMES and others
AREVALO et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2011cv02339
Plaintiff:
NUVIA AREVALO , RAUL GONZALEZ , RUBEN GUEVARA and others
Defendant:
UMHP PROPERTIES INC, UMH SALES AND FINANCE and GAIL WHITTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2011cv01251
Plaintiff:
Donovan Whitten
Defendant:
County of Alameda, J. Malizia, S. Tyrrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
