Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rau v. Schweizer et al
as 1:2014cv01280
Plaintiff:
Cheri Rau
Defendant:
D. C. Schweizer and Monty Cutlip
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loughlin, et al v. Vance County Department of Social Services, et al
as 5:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
Davada C. Loughlin, D. C. L. and Britt S. Moore
Defendant:
Vance County Department of Social Services , Linda Fry , Rene Betancourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRISTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. F. C. et al
as 2:2013cv05612
Plaintiff:
NORRISTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
F. C. and D. C.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Hurt v. D/C Board of Parole et al
as 1:2013cv05365
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D/C Board of Parole, Narcotics Agents (1942) and Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milton et al v. Regency Park Apartments et al
as 2:2013cv01284
Plaintiff:
Tajuana Milton, D. M. and D. C.
Defendant:
Regency Park Apartments, Jay Carmac Associates, LVW Apartments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Wisser v. West Virginia State Police, et al
as 1:2013cv03377
Plaintiff:
James Wisser
Defendant:
West Virginia State Police, D. C. Graham, A. P. Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurt, Tyrone v. D. C. Government, et al. et al
as 3:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D. C. Government, et al. and Corporation Council Office, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Georgia et al v. Duncan
as 1:2012cv01710
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia, Tyrone Police Department and D. C. Murphy
Defendant:
Nakita Q. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Thompson et al v. O'Nellion et al
as 5:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thompson and Whitney Thompson
Defendant:
Krystal O'Nellion , Carla Adams , Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
