Cases 61 - 70 of 17,211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jane Doe v. Pine Richland School District
as 24-1898
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
PINE RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 24-11670
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant:
JUDGE ORINDA D. EVANS, JUDGE WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., JUDGE JULIE E. CARNES and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brena et al v. Leibert Pierce et al
as 2:2024cv03998
Plaintiff:
Pastor LB Brena, MS Blackwell, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, Nabeel Zuberi, Mark Domeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILSON v. CITY OF ASHBURN et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Defendant:
SHIKINA WILSON, CITY OF ASHBURN, ERIC TAYLOR-HAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reddell v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joyce Reddell
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC, David Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
