Cases 71 - 80 of 92,002
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KELTON v. LICATA et al
as 3:2024cv06506
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KELTON
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSEPH LICATA and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES NOS. 1, 2, 3, ETC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Saade v. Bee Investments et al
as 1:2024cv11403
Plaintiff:
Jack Saade
Defendant:
Bee Investments and Does
Counter Defendant:
Bruce Efron
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
STROUD v. PARRELL et al
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY STROUD
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARRELL, JOHN DOES, CAPTAIN TRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall et al v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv01295
Plaintiff:
Lamon Hall and Shaneaqua Miller
Defendant:
City of Dallas, City of Dallas Police Department, City of Dallas Fire Rescue Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burton v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Burton
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
James Wright v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
