Cases 71 - 80 of 3,237
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Frazier v. Luther et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Defendant:
Justin Luther individually and doing business as Luther Properties, LLC, Phillip Kennedy and Angie Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Lance Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
LECO Properties, LLC v. Kaplan et al
as 6:2024cv01176
Defendant:
Michael Renfrow, Michael Kloesel and City of Kaplan
Plaintiff:
LECO Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LECO Properties, LLC v. Kaplan et al
as 6:2024cv01177
Defendant:
City of Kaplan, Michael Kloesel and Michael Renfrow
Plaintiff:
LECO Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03833
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01871
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Dudley v. Martin et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Y. Dudley
Defendant:
Hon. David S. Martin, Kevin Brewer, Premier Properties, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
