Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 374
Ronald Hummel v. Roebuck et al
as 5:2016cv00038
Defendant: California State Deputy Attorney General, Janet Erb and Amy M Roebuck
Plaintiff: Ronald Hummel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00444
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02323
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv09278
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01694
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02731
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02059
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03207
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Calabrese v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv02057
Plaintiff: Rachel Calabrese
Defendant: Amy Dardis, Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?