Cases 71 - 80 of 385
Judd v. Secretary of State of Colorado, et al
as 12-1320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF STATE OF COLORADO and STATE OF COLORADO
Keith Judd v. Secretary, State of Florida, et al
as 12-14365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, STATE OF FLORIDA and STATE OF FLORIDA
Keith Judd v. Secretary State of Louisiana, et al
as 12-30763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY STATE OF LOUISIANA and STATE OF LOUISIANA
Judd v. Holder, et al
as 12-1784
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Keith Judd v. Virgin Islands Board of Electi, et al
as 12-2597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIN ISLANDS BOARD OF ELECTIONS and GOVERNMENT VIRGIN ISLANDS
Keith Judd v. Secretary State of Louisiana, et al
as 12-30600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY STATE OF LOUISIANA and STATE OF LOUISIANA
Judd v. Oklahoma State Election Board, et al
as 12-6135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD, SECRETARY OF STATE, State of Oklahoma and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Judd v. Secretary of State for the State of Texas
as 3:2012cv01113
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of State for the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
In Re: Sanctioned Parties
as 5:2012mc00009
Plaintiff:
Sanctioned Parties
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd, Larry Joseph Cullum, Julius Warner Maracalin and others
Judd v. Secretary of State of Connecti
as 12-851
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent - Appellee:
Secretary of State of Connecticut and State of Connecticut
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
