Cases 81 - 90 of 261
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2017cv04786
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Defendant:
Sidney H Cates, IV, Baldwin, Haspel, Burke & Mayer, LLC, Thomas J. Cortazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates v. Stroud et al
as 2:2017cv01080
Plaintiff:
Tina Cates
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Bruce D. Stroud and Brian Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Victor Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Baptist Health, Douglas Weeks, Everett Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mason v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al (JRG2)
as 2:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Charles Mason, Jr.
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee , Armando Fontes , Tommy Large and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates v. Green et al
as 3:2016cv02724
Plaintiff:
Denine Cates
Defendant:
Gary Green and Cumberland County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLemore v. United States Housing and Urban Development et al (PLR2)
as 3:2016cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael Harmon McLemore
Defendant:
United States Housing and Urban Development, Rhonda Harris, Alvin Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erspamer v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00465
Defendant:
Adam D. Cate and Nevada, State Of
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Erspamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al v. PROSECUTOR OF MARION COUNTY INDIANA
as 1:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
FRED H. CATE, DEBOMOY LAHIRI, BRUCE LAMB and others
Defendant:
PROSECUTOR OF MARION COUNTY INDIANA and PROSECUTOR OF MONROE COUNTY INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
