Cases 81 - 90 of 904
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Gregory Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, et al
as 22-15869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY GARMONG
Defendant / Appellee:
TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, JOHN MARSHALL, BRIDGET CORNELL and others
Scioli v. AAA et al
as 2:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
Dana Scioli
Defendant:
AAA, Patrick Henry Schlecht and Verizon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glover v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 0:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Glover
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, Victra Connecting Technology of Life, Cristhian J. Made and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GIONET v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Susanne Gionet and SUSANNE GIONET
Not Classified By Court:
SUSAN E. LOFGREN
Defendant:
NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, Hon. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ADAM SCHIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.