Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Rafiyq Davis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2028
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Kenya Teasley v. Elizabeth O'Brien
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH CURRAN O'BRIEN
Chennells v. Curran et al
as 6:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Chennells
Defendant:
Michael J. Curran, Edward Haynes, Will Devin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donnelly v. Town of Scituate et al
as 1:2024cv11046
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Donnelly
Defendant:
Town of Scituate, Maura C. Curran, Andrew W Goodrich and others
Interested Party:
Town of Cohasset
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pope v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10980
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jabir Pope
Defendant:
City of Boston, Peter J. O'Malley, James T. Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Curran, III v. Carl Fronabarger, et al
as 24-5202
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. CURRAN, III
Defendant:
CARL A. FRONABARGER, STATE OF TENNESSEE, J. BRENT BRADBURY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb Job Discrimination (Race)
DAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04841
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
