Cases 1 - 10 of 690
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, David Wilder and Cody Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Singh v. Jonas et al
as 4:2024cv02162
Defendant:
Jaswinder Singh Bains, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Tiger Shroff and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mark Gill v. City of Hammond, Indiana, et al
as 24-1328
Plaintiff:
MARK A. GILL
Defendant:
CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, THOMAS MCDERMOTT, HAMMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Adimora-Nweke v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ernest Adimora-Nweke
Defendant:
Harris County, Houston Police Department, CWS Galleria, 5250 L.P. d/b/a "M5250" Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Gill v. Food Lion LLC
as 7:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Toivania E. Gill
Defendant:
Food Lion LLC. and Food Lion LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILL-GAYLE v. GIANT COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00719
Defendant:
GIANT COMPANY, LLC, GIANT FOOD STORES and GIANT FOOD STORE #6562
Plaintiff:
SHELLY GILL-GAYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
