Cases 1 - 10 of 868
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis v. Brudzinski et al.
as 3:2024cv01421
Defendant:
Nancy L. Jennings, Markus Finley, Raymond Alfred Runner and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kimberly Letke v. Kathleen Jennings, et al
as 24-2467
Defendant:
MATTHEW SPRENKLER, DELAWARE RECREATIONAL PARK POLICE, KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney General State of Delaware and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. LETKE
Dakotans for Health, et al v. Bob Ewing, et al
as 24-2624
Plaintiff:
Dakotans for Health, Adam Weiland and Rick Weiland
Defendant:
Richard Sleep, In official capacity, Lawrence County Commissioners, In official capacity, Bob Ewing, In official capacity and others
Holmes v. Ojeda et al
as 2:2024cv01468
Defendant:
Officer H. Jennings, Officer J. Keenan, Officer Balaha and others
Plaintiff:
David Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-12443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv05545
Plaintiff:
Charisse Samantha Moore
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Governor Brian Kemp, Wright Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
