Cases 1 - 10 of 35
OJO v. WE PEBBLE POINT, LLC
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
JIBOLA OJO
Defendant:
WE PEBBLE POINT, LLC doing business as PEBBLE POINT APARTMENTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
OJO v. WE PEBBLE POINT, LLC
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
JIBOLA OJO
Defendant:
WE PEBBLE POINT, LLC doing business as PEBBLE POINT APARTMENTS and MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ojo v. WE Pebble Point, LLC
as 1:2023cv09010
Plaintiff:
Jibola Ojo
Defendant:
WE Pebble Point, LLC doing business as Pebble Point Apartments and Marion County Small Claims Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ojo et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
as 0:2023cv01821
Plaintiff:
Ayodele M. Ojo and Ojo Law Office
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The State of Georgia v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv05154
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia
Defendant:
Joseph Adams, Michael Adams, Enoch Ojo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ojo et al v. Brew Vino LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00661
Defendant:
Jordan Lyle Chronister, Steve Chronister, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Ann Crosby and Myneca Y. Ojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
Roger Reid, Michael Garrett, Abewole Ojo and others
Defendant:
John Doe, 15, John Doe, 10, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
