Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Riethmiller v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2024cv00530
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff:
Annamarie D. Riethmiller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Ferguson
as 24-40231
Plaintiff:
John Doe, individually and as next friends of Janie Doe 1 and Janie Doe 2, Minor children and Jane Doe, individually and as next friends of Janie Doe 1 and Janie Doe 2, minor children
Defendant:
Holly Ferguson and Annamarie Hamrick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Riethmiller v. GBR Pizza Inc
as 5:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Annamarie Riethmiller
Defendant:
GBR Pizza Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roemer v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State University et al
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Gary Roemer
Defendant:
Board of Regents of New Mexico State University, Dan Arvizu, Laura Castille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. ROBINSON
Defendant:
COMPASS GROUP USA, INC., MORRISON HEALTHCARE, AMIT MEHTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Annamarie Riethmiller v. Unnamed Defendants
as 21-2430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNAMARIE RIETHMILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNNAMED DEFENDANTS
Cocreham v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2021cv02044
Plaintiff:
Lillian Cocreham
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jeri Williams, Cody Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cocreham v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01670
Plaintiff:
Lillian Cocreham
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jeri Williams, Cody Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morgan v. City of Taylor et al
as 2:2021cv10439
Defendant:
Matthew Oliver, Officer Simmons, City of Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan Pierre-Logerald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
