Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Harris v. COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO
as 1:2024cv02759
Plaintiff:
Joy C Harris
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06344
Plaintiff:
Yusuf A. Harris, Ishmael C. Harris, Gregory S. Harris and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Adrew Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. City of Ferguson Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Rosalind D. Harris
Defendant:
City of Ferguson Missouri, Ferguson Police Department, Bernadette C. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shantricia Robinson v. Stephen Ott, et al
as 22-10330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANTRICIA ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN DOUGLASS OTT, in his official and individual capacties, EMILY CHRISTINE LONG, in her official and individual capacities, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Harris v. Brookside, The Town of, Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01341
Plaintiff:
Sandra C Harris
Defendant:
Brookside, The Town of, Alabama and Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ott et al
as 3:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Shantricia Robinson
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Douglass Ott, SAAG Emily Christine Long, City of Fayetteville, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
