Cases 1 - 10 of 4,678
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Labor-Management Relations (Findings and Purpose)
Moaf et al v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Mohsen Moaf and Jacqueline A Moaf
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Dan Gordon, Robert Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Law v. Chu et al
as 3:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gilbert Law
Defendant:
Neil Chu, R. Muniz and Elizabeth Kita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER
Defendant:
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
