Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Donalson v. City of Canton, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Barney Donalson doing business as God's Property Ministries
Defendant:
City of Canton, Texas, David Ritter, Edwin Voss and others
Intervenor:
Richard Grega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Cleveland City Council, et al.
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
Chris Martin
Defendant:
Cleveland City Council and Blaine Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chris Martin v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Officer Henry Canjura, Detective Tony Fitzsimmons, Officer FN Avila and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv03228
Defendant:
Oglesby, Orquiz Rios, City of Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lajuane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. City of Warren et al
as 4:2017cv01109
Plaintiff:
Jimmie White
Defendant:
City of Warren, Chris Martin, Jason McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Simon Pearce (U.S.), Inc.
as 2:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Chris Martin
Defendant:
Simon Pearce (U.S.), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
