Cases 1 - 10 of 11
STEWART v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN STEWART
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Francis v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2021cv00706
Defendant:
Lyndon Southern Insurance Company, Christopher Bryan, Brian J. Curole and others
Plaintiff:
Darian Curtis Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hin v. U.S. Dept. of Justice U.S. Marshals, et al.,
as 2:2021cv00393
Defendant:
Adam Groff, Christopher Bryan Slate, County of San Joaquin and others
Plaintiff:
Sokcheath Hin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Imani et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00439
Defendant:
Melvin Lee Holden, City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Plaintiff:
Blair Imani, Akeem Muhammad, Raae Pollard and others
Interested Party:
James W Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryan v. The People of the State of NY et al
as 7:2014cv08305
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan
Defendant:
The People of the State of NY and Adeel Mirza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bryan v. Keith
as 13-4879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Bryan, parent on behalf of Noah Bryan, Taylor Bryan, Jesse Bryan friends of quartered soldiers
Defendant - Appellee:
Alexander B. Keith, General; in his official capacity as Director of the National Security and Chief of the Central Security Service and O
Bryan v. Keith
as 1:2013cv07835
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan
Defendant:
Alexander B. Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Novelo
as 1:2011cv09017
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryan Young
Defendant:
Milo Novelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
