Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Goodman et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Valancia Goodman and Gregory Maloy
Defendant:
Sheriff/Chief Deputy Levon Allen, Chief Deputy / Sheri Roland Boehrer, Jail Adminisrator Terrance Gibson and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Jail Officer F. Radford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Burks
as 1:2018cv03285
Defendant:
Officer D. Burks
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin et al v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joe Austin and Michelle Wilson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, William H. Ruby, DO, Mina Ko, LPN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Burke v. Litsscher et al
as 2:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Burke, Sr
Defendant:
Jon E Litsscher, David Melby, Lance Wiersma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
