Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 533
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02875
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Dorsey v. County of Alameda
as 4:2024cv02089
Plaintiff: Matthew Dorsey
Defendant: County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shaquille Prince v. Michael Michienzi, et al
as 24-1514
Plaintiff: SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Defendant: MICHAEL MICHIENZI, #357 Romeoville PD, VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE and TOM DORSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Bey et al v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff: Noble Halona Bey, Latonya Dorsey and Mama T's, LLC
Defendant: City of Dothan, Alabama, Stephanie Wingfield, Allison Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorsey v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10646
Plaintiff: TONI DORSEY
Defendant: City of Detroit, Christa Towns, B.J. Groh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godfrey v. First Student et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv07377
Plaintiff: Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Defendant: First Student, Art Catering, Crosby Energy Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant: Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?