Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gordon v. Order of the Rainbow
as 26-2527
Plaintiff:
AVA GORDON
Defendant:
ORDER OF THE RAINBOW, ORDER OF THE EASTERN STAR, PRINCE HALL FREEMASONS and others
Hill v. Naphcare, U.S., Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv02516
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T. McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McCamey v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2026cv12943
Plaintiff:
Delener McCamey
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Wayne County Sherrif's Department and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. Naphcare Inc et al
as 4:2026cv04184
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. Order of the Rainbow et al
as 1:2026cv05488
Plaintiff:
Ava Gordon
Defendant:
Order of the Rainbow, Order of the Eastern Star, Prince Hall Freemasons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Acosta v. United States Gov.
as 26-1027
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ACOSTA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STATE OF NEW YORK, EXECUTIVE BRANCHES OF POWER AND COUNTER PARTS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
