Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Acosta v. United States Gov.
as 26-1027
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ACOSTA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STATE OF NEW YORK, EXECUTIVE BRANCHES OF POWER AND COUNTER PARTS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davidson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2025cv06015
Plaintiff:
Ronald Davidson
Defendant:
City of New York, Michelle Morse, Molly Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acosta v. United States Gov. et al
as 1:2025cv05469
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Acosta
Defendant:
United States Gov., State of New York, Executive Branches of Power and Counter Parts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Rite Aid - Culver City
as 25-1684
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene, Jr.
Defendant:
Rite Aid - Culver City
State of Washington et al v. Trump et al
as 2:2025cv00602
Plaintiff:
State of Washington and State of Oregon
Defendant:
Executive Office of the President, Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem and others
Amicus Curiae:
Local Elections Officials, Former Republican Members of Congress, Republican Party of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Greene v. Rite Aid - Culver City
as 4:2025cv00300
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Rite Aid - Culver City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
