Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Roberson v. Connick et al
as 2:2023cv04022
Plaintiff:
Tamisha Bickham Roberson
Defendant:
Paul Connick, Samantha Webb, Michael Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv05270
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
Clifford Martin, Gerald Jones, Kameisha Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. McFadden et al
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Sand LNU, Tasha Young, Gary L. McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2019cv00855
Plaintiff:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
SCOTT PETRI, JOSEPH T. ASHDALE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
Jones v. Shadid
as 1:2015cv01288
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
James Shadid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. Jackson Public School District et al
as 3:2015cv00158
Defendant:
Jackson Public School District, Eric Greene, Officer Dood and others
Plaintiff:
Garza, Mary Rose Short, Sarah Durling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Jones v. City of Boston, et al
as 13-1671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BOSTON and EDWARD DAVIS, Boston Police Commissioner
Defendant:
A-1 AND D-4 DRUG CONTROL UNITS and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
