Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Leaming v. Sampson et al
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Leaming
Defendant:
Matthew Sampson Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Chief of Police doing business as Lt. J. Doe, et ux., VA Police, Michael J. Franklin, John Doe doing business as Disruptive Behavior Committee, et ux. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aycock v. Love, Jr. et al
as 5:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Aycock
Defendant:
Jimmy L. Love, Jr., Leon A. Lucas and J. Franklin Wood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tirzah J. Franklin et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv10553
Defendant:
Officer Greg Su, Officer Jeff Day, Officer Marco Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
M.L.F., Jamar R Franklin, Tirzah J Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FRANKLIN v. JASPER COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
RONALD J FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JASPER COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Qualls v. Gary Indiana City of
as 2:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Hakimah Qualls
Defendant:
Gary Indiana City of , J Franklin , Emilio Guajardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEFFERSON v. HUSAIN et al
as 2:2014cv02485
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. JEFFERSON
Defendant:
ALI HUSAIN , ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER , ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
