Cases 1 - 10 of 551
Hayes v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Julius Hayes
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, Shelby County Sheriff Department, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mundy v. Village of Summit et al
as 1:2024cv04277
Plaintiff:
William Mundy
Defendant:
Village of Summit, Sergio Rodriguez, Jerry Hurckes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glover v. Carlin
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Julius Glover, II
Defendant:
Harley Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Vaughn v. Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC
as 1:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
Julius Maurice Vaughn
Defendant:
Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
North v. Harris Central Appraisal District et al
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamunn North
Defendant:
Harris Central Appraisal District and Mike Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mulder v. Girling et al (MAG +)
as 2:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Julius Littleton Mulder
Defendant:
Dr. Girling, The County of Elmore, Warden Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
North v. Spring Independent School District et al
as 4:2023cv03749
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamunn North
Defendant:
Spring Independent School District, Justine Durant, Winford Adams, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
