Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Ball et al v. Nilsson et al
as 0:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jeannie F. Ball, Jennifer J. Ball, Jeannie Ball and others
Defendant:
James Arthur Nilsson, Ben Frye, Erik Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Johnson and James Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
Ethan Jones, Chase McKeown, Thomas Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09659
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. City of Pikeville et al
as 1:2019cv00238
Defendant:
City of Pikeville, TN, Bledsoe County Tennessee, Chase Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Nilsson
as 0:2018cv03458
Plaintiff:
Jeannie F. Ball
Defendant:
James Arthur Nilsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2018cv04776
Defendant:
Beauty Baldwin, Ralph F. (Rusty) Simpson, Seth Harp and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Clark, Jeanne Dufort, Dana Bowers and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Fazal Khan and Carolyn Bourdeaux for Congress
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign Legal Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharkey v. Humphreys County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Sharkey
Defendant:
Humphreys County, Mississippi , J. D. Roseman and Sean Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Nilsson
as 0:2017cv03284
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Frances Bell
Defendant:
James Arthur Nilsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
