Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Holley v. Woolard et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Betsy S. Holley and John L. Smith
Defendant:
Elvanetta S. Woolard, Pamela Fleming, Taneisha W. Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Landry v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Ana Cristina Cola, Rhode Island State Police, Lt. R. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Norman J. Landry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Tubbs v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Regina Tubbs
Defendant:
State of Texas, Dover Control Systems, Omni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Perkins et al
as 2:2023cv01931
Plaintiff:
John Michael Smith
Defendant:
Richard Perkins, Todd L. Moody and Christina M. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fantel v. Brutinel et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Fantel
Defendant:
Robert Brutinel, Pamela Sue Frasher Gates, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Edwards v. Jack et al
as 4:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Ginger L. Edwards
Defendant:
Grant H. Jack, Richard "Dick" Smith, Dallas District Atty's Ofc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smithson v. Hammond et al
as 3:2022cv05029
Plaintiff:
Daniel B Smithson
Defendant:
Daryl Jonathan Hammond, Jane Doe Hammond, Sarah Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
