Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kim Jackson v. Chris Dutra, et al
as 22-15622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS DUTRA, JASON EDMONSON and ERIC DEJESUS
Jackson, et al. v. City of Modesto, et al.
as 1:2021cv00415
Defendant:
Alex Bettis, City of Modesto, Modesto Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Jackson, Alyssa Cabrera, Matthew Boring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dutra et al
as 3:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Eric Dejesus, Chris Dutra and Jason Edmonson
Plaintiff:
Kim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Simpson v. Neilson et al
as 3:2018cv00845
Defendant:
Does 1-10, David Wynn, Stevon Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gary Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chrisp v. Advanced Spine and Pain Center et al
as 5:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Joey Traymond Chrisp
Defendant:
Advanced Spine and Pain Center, Kim Jackson, Vonetta Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson et al v. Rainer School District No. 13 et al
as 3:2011cv00602
Defendant:
R. Michael Carter, Rainier School Board and Rainier School District No. 13
Plaintiff:
Bailey Jackson, Denning Jackson and Kim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONNOLLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2008cv01927
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, W. LEE RAWLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
