Cases 1 - 10 of 295
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Martinez et al v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez and We Are Not Invisible
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Howard Lacy, David Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lacy v. Turner
as 1:2023cv01763
Plaintiff:
Janice Lacy
Defendant:
Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hillard et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv06573
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Hillard, Danyel Lacy, Kaycee Suitter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cathey v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Colton Cathey
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Cerelyn Davis, John Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lacy v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Albert William Lacy
Defendant:
Mark E. Taylor, Tammie Roberts, Clark D. Adkins and others
Interested Party:
Monique Lacy
Lacy v. Davis et al (TV2)
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Lacy
Defendant:
Buddy Davis, Josh Davis, Michael Arnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Hancock Whitney Bank
as 2:2023cv04418
Plaintiff:
Lacie Robinson
Defendant:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
