Cases 1 - 10 of 4,864
Konan v. Saydah et al
as 6:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Raymond Konan
Defendant:
Neil A. Saydah and Saydah Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Samaritano v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 24-1889
Plaintiff:
JASON SAMARITANO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GLENN GRANT, in his official capacity, CRISTEN DARRIGO, Judge, NewJersey Superior Court, Law Division, Criminal Part. Cumberland County, in his official capacity and others
Law v. Chu et al
as 3:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gilbert Law
Defendant:
Neil Chu, R. Muniz and Elizabeth Kita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shin v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Gloria H. Shin
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Color of law agent (including Municipalities) Jane and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
