Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
ALLEN v. EVANS et al
as 1:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
N. EVANS, N.C. STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, JENNIFER TALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ALLEN v. COGGINS et al
as 1:2022cv00575
Petitioner:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
K. COGGINS, NC STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, JENNIFER TALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. TALLEY et al
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
JENNIFER TALLEY, RENEE WARD, MEGAN M. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
David Nordlund v. Dominick Eubank, et al
as 22-35095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. NORDLUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DOMINICK EUBANK, GREGORY SMITH, AARON RICHWINE and others
Nordlund v. Eubank et al
as 3:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Sondra Thomas, Dominick Eubank, Aaron Richwine and others
Plaintiff:
David C. Nordlund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Taylor et al
as 2:2016cv13374
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Garner
Defendant:
Taylor, City of and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garner et al v. Roseville, City of et al
as 2:2016cv10760
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Garner , Christopher Garner and William Kaupus
Defendant:
Roseville, City of, Glenn Sexton, Rodney Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00322
Plaintiff:
Jean A. Anderson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Don Lewis and M. Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
