Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Kenneth Tennant v. Stephanie Rose
as 23-2165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth C. Tennant
Plaintiff:
Gregory Francis Tennant
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephanie M. Rose, Honorable, Chief Judge, USDC SDIA
Riley v. United States Bankruptcy Court et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Hon. David R. Duncan, Bruce M. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Worcester Interfaith, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40015
Plaintiff:
Nelly Medina, Ruth Rodriguez-Fay, Delia Vega and others
Defendant:
Candy Mero-Carlson, John Stewart, Worcester Board of Election Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Easterling v. Trump et al
as 3:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Michael J. Newman, Timothy S Black, Thomas M Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Easterling v. Rice et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Michael J. Newman, Linda L. Woeber, Matthew Horowitz and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Easterling v. Rice et al
as 2:2019cv00469
Defendant:
Michael J. Newman, Linda L. Woeber, Matthew Horowitz and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Easterling v. Sessions et al
as 3:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Defendant:
Jeffrey Sessions and Thomas M Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
