Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wakita Doriety v. Matthew Sletten
as 23-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAKITA DORIETY, as the Administrator for the Estate of Nasanto Antonio Crenshaw
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW LEWIS SLETTEN, in his individual capacity pursuant to document 6, First Amended Complaint and CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA, A.G. BATEMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
DORIETY v SLETTEN et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
WAKITA DORIETY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA and MATTHEW LEWIS SLETTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
SMALL v. BOONE COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2021cv01881
Defendant:
MIKE NIELSEN, THOMAS BEARD and BOONE COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEWIS SMALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pinnock v. Lewis
as 1:2016cv04502
Defendant:
John Doe and Police Officer Matthew Lewis
Plaintiff:
Mr. Loel Pinnock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Callender v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02936
Plaintiff:
Shomari Callender
Defendant:
John/Jane Does, Matthew Lewis, John Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John v. Lewis et al
as 1:2015cv05346
Plaintiff:
Harris John
Defendant:
P.O. Matthew Lewis and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv05294
Defendant:
P.O. "John Does" 1-2, P.O. Matthew Lewis and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Eddie Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
