Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Shay v. Commonwealth of Pa Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2023cv03506
Plaintiff:
Gerald Shay
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pa Department of Transportation, Joseph Homitz and MATTHEW WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Curtis v. Nessel et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Curtis
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker, United States of America and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Joshua v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2019cv20348
Defendant:
Instagram, Holliness Temple Church International "Holiness Temple", Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
King Joshua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norris v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2019cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Norris
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker and Thomas E. Brandon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 4:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cochran
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker, Jay Clayton and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Aposhian v. Whitaker et al
as 2:2019cv00037
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, Matthew Whitaker, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
W. Clark Aposhian
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MR. A. v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00015
Defendant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, RONALD D. VITIELLO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff:
MR. A.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
