Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ames v. Ames et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Randall S Ames
Defendant:
Stanley Roy Ames, Wesley Bruce Ames, Merita Lynn Dysart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ames v. Ames et al
as 2:2021cv00281
Plaintiff:
Randall S Ames
Defendant:
Stanley Roy Ames, Wesley Bruce Ames and Merita Lynn Dysart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv03534
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Oless Brumfield, et al v. William Dodd, et al
as 13-31262
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OLESS BRUMFIELD, as next friend of Ervin Brumfield, Merita Brumfield, Preston Brumfield, and Alan Brumfield, JOHN DEMLY, Rev.; as next friend of Dorothy Ceasar, Mary Ceasar, and King Johnson Caesar, WOODROW W. WILEY, JR., as next friend of Donna Wiley, Pamela Wiley, and Woodrow W. Wiley, III and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant - Appellant:
MITZI DILLON, TITUS DILLON, MICHAEL LEMANE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thompson v. Hopkins, et al
as 11-1530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MERITA A. HOPKINS, individually and in her capacity as Justice of Essex Superior Court, FRANCES A. MCINTYRE, individually and in her capacity as Justice of Essex Superior Court, MITCHELL H. KAPLAN, individually and in his capacity as Justice of Essex Superior Court and others
Thompson v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2011cv10475
Defendant:
Merita A. Hopkins , Frances A. McIntyre , Mitchell H. Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
