Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Karen Sinclair, et al v. Michael Akins, et al
as 14-35617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN SINCLAIR, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for K.S. and J.A., minor children and JULIAN AL-GHAMDI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL AKINS, Detective, Grandview Police Department and MARK NEGRETE, Police Officer, Selah Police Department
Sinclair et al v. Grandview, City of et al
as 2:2012cv03041
Plaintiff:
Karen Sinclair , KS , JA and others
Defendant:
Grandview, City of , Michael Akins , Mark Negrete and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Copper et al v. Harris et al
as 4:2012cv00987
Plaintiff:
Dean Copper , Brenda Copper , Traci Gehm and others
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris , Benjamin Diehl and James M. Toma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copper et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2012cv00987
Plaintiff:
Dean Copper , Brenda Copper , Traci Gehm and others
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris, Benjamin Diehl and James M. Toma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allana Boroni et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv07303
Plaintiff:
Allana Boroni, Dean Cooper, Brenda Cooper and others
Defendant:
State of California, County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malmquist v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2007cv02048
Plaintiff:
Danielle Malmquist
Defendant:
City of Memphis, City of Memphis, Michael Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
