Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kress v. Zoning Hearing Board of Sugarloaf Township et al
as 3:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Harry J. Kress, Jr.
Defendant:
Zoning Hearing Board of Sugarloaf Township, Timothy Mundie, George Maue and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jefferson v. DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Katherine Jefferson
Defendant:
DeSoto County, Mississippi, Bill Rasco, Desoto County, Mississippi Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garland v. Mundy Township et al
as 2:2022cv11272
Plaintiff:
Stacey Garland
Defendant:
Mundy Township, City of Swartz Creek and Blake Hiben
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Commonwealth of Virginia et al v. Mundy
as 4:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia and City of Newport News
Defendant:
Eddie Eugene Mundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
