Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Goodwin v. The California Department of Insurance et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Duchun Lafre Goodwin
Defendant:
The California Department of Insurance, Liza Pedrosa, David Axelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
MILLER et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2021cv01441
Plaintiff:
CHASITY LYNN MILLER and MIGUEL A. PEDROSA
Defendant:
JACOB ROBERTS and MICHAEL CARCELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horst et al v. Campbell et al
as 4:2017cv05152
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Horst, JMW and LAW
Defendant:
Jody Campbell, State of Wasington Department of Social and Health Services, Children's Administration, Department of Child and Family Services and Child Protective Services, Heather Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEDROSA v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2017cv00043
Defendant:
THE CITY OF EVANSVILLE, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and UNKNOWN EVANSVILLE POLICE OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
ANGEL PEDROSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv09110
Plaintiff:
Frank Reyes
Defendant:
City of New York , Joseph McKenna, Branden Pedrosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
