Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PETRISOR v. RODGERS et al
as 1:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
DAVID PETRISOR
Defendant:
D. RODGERS, J. SWARINGEN and R. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson, IV v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Wesley Tillman Nelson, IV
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, T. K. Waters, D. H. Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05994
Plaintiff:
Rylawn R. Walker
Defendant:
City of New York, Richard Degaetano, P.O. Troy Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-16603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01682
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, GENERAL HENRY L. BENNING CAMP NO. 517 v. CITY OF COLUMBUS et al
as 4:2019cv00203
Defendant:
JERRY "POPS" BARNES, JUDY W. THOMAS, GLENN DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, GENERAL HENRY L. BENNING CAMP NO. 517 and SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS GENERAL HENRY L BENNING CAMP NO 517
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WALKER v. BEATTY
as 2:2019cv05071
Defendant:
CHARLES BEATTY
Plaintiff:
KELLY R. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
