Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-12424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bias v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv00280
Defendant:
R James Archibald, City of Rexburg Police Department, Wynn Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. William Bias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Majdalani v. Auburn University et al
as 3:2018cv00894
Defendant:
John Winn, Brian Thurow, William Hardgrave and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Majdalani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
The Lake Hills Motel, Inc. et al v. Board of Trustees of the Benton County Sewer District #1 et al
as 2:2017cv04238
Plaintiff:
The Lake Hills Motel, Inc. and Josephine L Baker
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Benton County Sewer District #1 , Harold R. James , Rodney Meyer and others
Cross_claimant:
Construction Services and Management, LLC and Mark Geisinger
Cross_defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Benton County Sewer District #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-14944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
