Cases 1 - 10 of 31
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Smith v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety and Matthew Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Poffenbarger v. Kendall et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael Poffenbarger
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Robert Miller, Richard Scobee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Normand v. Anderson et al
as 1:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Raymond Smith, Sheriff Douglas Anderson, John Lemoine and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Travis Normand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Normand v. Anderson et al
as 1:2020cv00178
Not Classified By Court:
John Lemoine and Floyd Laprairie
Defendant:
Sheriff Douglas Anderson, Steve Martel and Raymond Smith
Plaintiff:
Brandon Travis Normand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. FORD et al
as 5:2019cv00312
Defendant:
CITY OF BYRON, WILLIAM PATTERSON, BILL LAVENDER and others
Plaintiff:
AMY RYLES and RAYMOND SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Pickens et al
as 2:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Osie Pickens , Anthony Sanders and Geraldine Parte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. City of Fort Lauderdale
as 0:2017cv61211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stone , Jamira Hawthorne , Michelle Konders and others
Defendant:
City of Fort Lauderdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
