Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv09668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THOMAS v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA, COLEMAN MCDONOUGH, SCOTT SCHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Irvin v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Judge Charles Smith, State of Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Clarksville, Montgomery County Tennessee City Court and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. The City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
The City of Clarksville, Ted Crozier, Jr., Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mueller v. Walmart Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv02500
Defendant:
Walmart Incorporated and Robert Thomas, Jr.
Plaintiff:
T. Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lyons v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 3:2019cv02457
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company, James Bartley, Maleah Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Irvin v. The Fort Sill National Bank
as 3:2019cv00838
Defendant:
The Fort Sill National Bank
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Brasher-Cunningham et al
as 3:2019cv00758
Plaintiff:
David Robert Thomas
Defendant:
National Conference of the United Church of Christ, Debora M. Hess, First Congregational Church of Guilford and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
