Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Rene Valdivia, et al v. Derek Porsch, et al
as 24-1668
Plaintiff: Rene Valdivia and Alexis Free
Defendant: Derek Porsch, Gabriel Christensen, Derick Seaton and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Howard v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02351
Plaintiff: Joseph Howard
Defendant: City of New York, Duane Seaton and Police Officers John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valdivia et al v. Porsch et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff: RENE VALDIVIA and ALEXIS FREE
Defendant: DEREK PORSCH, GABRIEL CHRISTENSEN, DERICK SEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3043
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harmon v. Helms et al
as 2:2022cv04129
Plaintiff: Dennis Harmon
Defendant: Tony Helms, Bryce Easley, Nevin Seaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00411
Plaintiff: Monique Shenell Ford
Defendant: Corizon Health Inc., Richard B. Ashby, Lois Ntiamoah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01000
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seaton v. Atos Healthcare Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01526
Plaintiff: Marsha Seaton
Defendant: Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc., Atos Healthcare Services, LLC and Atos IT Outsourcing Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malott v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2021cv01674
Defendant: City of Walnut Creek, Jay Hill, Will Appel and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Malott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?