Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Almer v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Almer
Defendant:
Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Travis King, et al v. Demichael Dews, et al
as 22-15743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS SCOTT KING, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Breana Raymundo and BREANNA RAYMUNDO
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMICHAEL DEWS, CALVIN NEE and JOHN TRAN
Defendant:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
CONKLIN v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Defendant:
DEAN ROBINSON, LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION and WILLIAM HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Davis
as 3:2019cv07722
Plaintiff:
Breanna Raymundo and Travis Scott King
Defendant:
Ronald Davis, Demichael Dews, Calvin Nee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONKLIN v. RIVERS CASINO
as 2:2018cv01556
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT CONKLIN
Defendant:
RIVERS CASINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dishner v. David Quillen et al (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Dishner
Defendant:
David Quillin, Mike Hickman, Detective (FNU) Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dishner v. Kingsport Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Dishner
Defendant:
Kingsport Police Department, Kingsport, City of, David Quillin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Conklin v. Safford
as 4:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Conklin
Defendant:
Charity Joe Safford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erb v. Zatorski et al
as 1:2009cv02123
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Erb
Defendant:
Officer John Zatorski, William Sullivan, Leslie A. Fillak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
