Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Raskas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01220
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Raskas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dowling v. Uber et al
as 2:2024cv02208
Defendant:
United States District Court of San Francisco, CA, Superior Court of San Francisco, Uber and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Dawn Dowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Defendant:
Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Alphabet Inc., Cox Communication Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosado Sanchez v. Kalanick, et al
as 24-1535
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, GARRET CAMP and others
Plaintiff:
PABLO ENRIQUE ROSADO SANCHEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Milton v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
Cameron Milton
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
